Today, let’s talk about the latest project from a co-founder of Vine and what it tells us about how the tech industry is evolving. This is a rare tech story where basically every fact of it has surprised me on some level. And while some of the ideas here are way out there — to the point that I’m imagining many of you slamming your laptops closed to avoid hearing any more — the far frontier they represent appears to be inching nearer to the mainstream every day.
The road to Loot
When I wrote in March about non-fungible tokens, or NFTs, I tried to dazzle you by rattling off some of the more spectacular sales numbers from the time: $600,000 for the Nyan Cat meme, $5.8 million for artwork by Grimes, $230 million in lifetime sales for NBA Top Shot.
What has occurred since then has been enough to make some of those numbers gaze minuscule by comparability. On Thursday, the owners of an NFT associated with the original doge meme, which had been purchased for $4 million in June, bought partial possession in the piece via tokens. (Coindesk has a worthy clarification of how this works.) Buyers snapped up the token, and now that single NFT is valued at $225 million.
Even as NFTs slipped out of the headlines in the mainstream press, then, the number of people creating, acquiring and trading them continued to develop.
That brings us to Dom Hofmann. Hofmann is best known as the co-creator of Vine, which helped to establish the quick-form video format on mobile devices and became an incredible engine of meme tradition alongside the way. Later he created Peach, a pop-up social community that remained beloved by its users far after its brief moment in the spotlight faded. More recently he worked on an effort to revive Vine as an app called Byte; it bought earlier this year.
Like a lot of software engineers, Hofmann had kept tabs on the world of cryptocurrencies as they evolved over the past decade, occasionally buying coins to better understand how they work. In the last decade, most of the focus on the blockchain was related to the original project: Bitcoin. More recently, though, developers have developed fond of an alternative blockchain, Ethereum, which is designed to let them create decentralized applications through more sophisticated smart contracts than Bitcoin enables.
For the first few years after Ethereum was invited, nothing much materialized that would be of worthy interest to the mainstream. But then a bunch of companies initiated growing really quickly last year by building decentralized finance apps on its blockchain, over a handful of months that came to be known as “DeFi summer.” (The worst part of writing about blockchain technologies is every single name involved.)
After that occurred, Ethereum became like any other platform that had suddenly proven itself succesful of producing huge quantities of money: it initiated to attract developers in droves.
Hofmann was 1 of them. In December, he began to educate himself Solidity, the programming language for creating smart contracts on Ethereum. He also bought an art piece he had created as an NFT and loved the process. As he created, he became more and more interested in using NFTs to inspire decentralized creative initiatives.
In March, he created Blitmap, which he described as a “community-created fantasy universe.” It wound up serving as a kind of blueprint for what Loot would become.
Working with 16 other artists, Hofmann created 100 32-by-32 pixel images combining elements of science fiction and fantasy; those were then “remixed” into 1,600 “siblings.” The thought was to use the Blitmaps as the basis for a kind of blockchain version of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, turning characters into merchandise, games. The project was a modest hit — the cheapest Blitmap today costs about $98,000.
More importantly, it set the stage for what was to approach.
One of Hofmann’s other side initiatives in recent years was to create a text-based adventure of the sort that served as the basis for some of the original video games. As part of the development process, he wrote a random item generator: a piece of software that would return names for various weapons, pieces of armor, and accessories.
Since Blitmap’s launch, Hofmann had been considering about other novel ways to promote the creation of blockchain-based art and communities to surround them. One thought he had was to let people create (or “mint,” in blockchain-speak) NFTs based on his random-item generator for free — essentially just to see what would happen. He would not provide any art work or any instructions on what to do with them. And he would give these “bags” of items away for free, minus the transaction fees required by the Ethereum community.
“A lot of people have been wanting some sort of game that takes place in a fantasy realm, or a science-fiction realm,” he told me. “They want it to be suitable with with other realms. They want to be able to construct on top of that. They want to know that the items that they have will always be with them. [I was] just kind of building in that path. It was an experiment.”
His only real goal, he said, was that people would choose to mint all the bags he made available.
Last Friday night, Hofmann announced Loot in a tweet:
An uncharitable way of describing all this is to say that Hofmann created a way to let people pay the Ethereum community to return a list of useless names to them. But Hofmann’s fans saw it very differently, and quickly turned Loot into a phenomenon.
The 7,777 bags that Hofmann offered up for minting were all snapped up more or less instantly. In the next 5 days, Coindesk reported, Loot bags were resold for $46 million, and had a market cap of $180 million. On Wednesday, the cheapest Loot bag could be had for about $20,000. That price more than doubled overnight, and would now cost more than $46,000.
So far, this seems like any other NFT story: weird artwork is launched, price goes up quickly. What makes Loot different is the number and variety of initiatives that have spun up around it at a staggering velocity.
Then they began to create guilds based on the items found in their bags. Owners of ”divine robes,” of which there are only 396 in Loot, set up their own community — alongside with a storefront for robe purchase (cheapest price: $169,142).
Then, they used smart contracts to let people sell individual items from inside their Loot bags to, as the creator put it, “upgrade your adventurer.”
At this point I feel it necessary to point out that there are no adventurers in Loot. There is no game in Loot. There are just items, and pictures of those items, and tens of millions of dollars betting that it will all somehow turn into something much more. As 1 tweet put it: “Loot is NFT improv.”
Now the question is whether Loot will somehow evolve backwards from a set of in-game items to an actual, playable experience. If so, who will develop it? And how? For the moment, no 1 really knows.
“Obviously, games are very involved,” said Hofmann, who has been monitoring all these developments as a moderator of Loot’s thriving Discord server. “It stays to be seen what’s done with that, but it’s definitely a possibility. I think it would be really cool.”
One thing that pursuits him is looking whether Loot items can span different games constructed by different people — a concept which is key to what tech leaders this summer have taken to calling the metaverse.
A key aspect of making that happen is to make Loot more accessible — the vast majority of people being unwilling to spend thousands of dollars to participate. On Wednesday, Hofmann announced “synthetic Loot” — essentially, a replica Loot bag that can be claimed by anyone who sets up an Ethereum pockets for free.
“Creators building on top of Loot can choose to recognize Synthetic Loot as a way to allow a wider range of adventurers to participate in the ecosystem, while nonetheless being able to easily differentiate between ‘original’ Loot and Synthetic Loot,” he tweeted.
So what next? Hofmann says he has no plans to shift full time to working on Loot. Due to the decentralized nature of the project, he’s not sure he could truly steer the community, even if he needed to. (He stays the biggest shareholder in the project, due to the hundreds of bags he has yet to release for minting.)
“I’m not leading the project,” he said. “I’m providing guidance, when needed.”
Mostly, he says, he’s just interested to see what the community does next.
One question I had is whether you can construct giant fictional worlds this way. Right now the NFT market is full of speculators hoping to flip their acquisitions for a quick profit. There is more than a tiny of the mania that fueled this winter’s meme stock enthusiasm to be found on the crypto Discords. (More than a tiny cynicism among the buyers, too.) How much will these folks ultimately be prepared to contribute to building a world?
But it’s also true that plenty of people get deeply involved in fictional worlds without owning the underlying intellectual property.
“At the end of the day, these are just items on a list,” Hofmann said. “It’s just what people do with it and how they ascribe value to it. And value doesn’t have to be a dollar amount. It can be many things.”
Of course, it’s also possible that the bottom falls out: that the frothy Loot market won’t be able to maintain itself. Perhaps owning these artificially scarce goods won’t prove as attractive over the lengthy run as they have been to collectors in 2021.
But this has always been the bear case for the blockchain: that ultimately enthusiasm for it would fizzle out, and everybody would lose their money. I’ve never been quite that bearish myself, but I get it: to the average person, it’s nonetheless not clear what anybody needs a blockchain for.
The thing that has always stopped me from being a blockchain bear is that each year, the number of smart people I know who are developing on it goes up. With every month that goes by, a bet on the failure of Ethereum means betting against a growing number of gifted people. The odds on that bet don’t feel worthy to me today — and they’re getting worse all the time.
With initiatives with Loot, we can start to see something new coming into focus: an open-source … something with probably broad appeal.
On his blog, gaming company founder Kyle Russell envisioned a successor to Marvel’s cinematic universe popping up on a project like Loot:
Assuming the project’s originators went with the path of the Loot zeitgeist, all of this would be [intellectual property] that could be re-used and remixed by anyone. That might sounds crazy — isn’t the point to own it, and the point of owning it is to control how it’s used?
That’s the Disney status quo. In a world of initiatives like Loot, you want to reinforce the value of the NFT you own — and that value reflects that NFT’s renown and reputation. Echoing the phrase “all press is fine press”: any remix is a fine remix. To be referenced is to nonetheless be culturally relevant. So if you own an NFT describing Arachnid Person, you want to contribute to an environment where as many people want to include Arachnid Person in their works as possible so that Arachnid Man #1 becomes something worth owning.
In the meantime, for the couple thousand people who managed to acquire them, Loot has been life-changing. Jackson Dame, who is the content and community supervisor at the cryptocurrency pockets Rainbow, told me he had only initiated paying consideration to cryptocurrencies 8 months ago.
Dame, 28, followed Hofmann’s work closely — he loved Blitmap — and was able to secure some Loot bags as part of the initial release.
“He was doing something very different with a lot of creative depth in comparability to most NFT initiatives,” Dame said. “So I sensed it had longer-lasting potential.”
After the price spiked, Dame bought part of his collection for 6 figures — he landed 2 divine robes, among other things — and was able to pay off his debts and contribute to his family members’ retirement.
As for Hofmann, he continues to work on multiple initiatives. There’s a Blitmap release coming up soon, he said. And he’s working on Supdrive, an effort to construct a fantasy gaming console on the blockchain. In the meantime, he says he’ll work on Loot “as just another builder” — “finding new ways to iterate on it and expand it,” he said.
What he’s not doing is elevating a bunch of venture capital and doing a traditional startup.
“Companies are difficult,” he said. “I’m enjoying having a respite from that.”